American diplomatic boycott of 2022 Olympics finds followers

But in China, the Washington demarche fell on not to your liking. Diplomatic demarches will hardly affect Beijing's position, because these are not even the sanctions imposed at different times on Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran. There is a good chance that the Beijing 2022 Games and Australia will join the dipboycot, whose relations with China have recently deteriorated. < p> At the same time, one should not forget about the purely intra-American factor. And this is not even connected with the coronavirus pandemic, but with politics. & Nbsp; “ The Biden administration will not send diplomatic or official representatives to the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games in Beijing in 2022, given the ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and other human rights violations, '' she said. According to her, we are talking only about the position of Washington – & nbsp; foreign allies of the Americans are free in their decisions and actions. Beijing threatened to retaliate for the demarche over the Winter Games The Olympic Games, which in recent years have been invariably associated with international scandals, are once again becoming an arena of political confrontation. The US authorities have decided to boycott the Beijing Olympics scheduled for February next year. So, for example, New Zealand, after the words of Psaki, instantly showed solidarity with the United States. First of all, among the “ boycotters '' there may, of course, be the Americans' partners in NATO, even less dependent on Chinese technologies and the local sales market, but interested in demonstrating loyalty to the White House. Истoчник www.mk.ru And, obviously, by February the number of such states will only increase, taking into account the position of the IOC. A similar demarche has already been divided by the world community, and its current stage, apparently, is & nbsp; clearly not the last. The Japanese authorities, which also have a very difficult relationship with Beijing, have not yet decided on a diplomatic boycott of the upcoming Olympics. His successor, Joe Biden, seemingly tried to smooth things over in bilateral relations between Washington and Beijing, which angered the more aggressive Republicans and the electorate of the part of the workers who believed in Trump's words of “ theft '' they have Chinese jobs. In particular, signals of readiness to join the demarche have already been received from London. Therefore, the current 'Olympic' The demarche of the United States can also be viewed as a kind of not the most clever attempt to strike a balance between decency (American athletes will still fly to the competition) and some kind of principledness, inherited by a “ suitcase without a handle ''; inherited from the previous administration. No, American athletes will go to the Games, but officials will not be present in the Chinese capital. The unwillingness to boycott the Games was reported in South Korea. Former US President Donald Trump made the confrontation with China at the forefront of his foreign policy. “ The actions of the United States seriously violate the principle of political neutrality of physical education and sports established by the Olympic Charter. Photo: AP The fact that the United States decided to declare a diplomatic boycott of the Olympic Games in Beijing in 2022 was announced during a regular briefing by the official & nbsp; Jen Psaki, US White House spokesman. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has already recognized the right of American diplomats not to go to Beijing, all the more & nbsp; that athletes from the United States will still perform and – & nbsp; under the Stars and Stripes flag. Boycotting various entertainment events is an old and familiar method of political struggle and other behind-the-scenes games that have little to do with sports. China expresses its strong discontent and strong protest to the United States, it has already made a strict presentation to the American side and will take decisive countermeasures, '' said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian, without specifying, however, the nature of the retaliatory steps.